<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe supports bad design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107</link>
	<description>All design, all the time</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Tane Design</title>
		<link>http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Tane Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Sorry you disagree, Fajar, but that's the nice part about a blog — I can voice my opinion and you can voice yours. I think you'd find that 99% of professional designers would tell you that stretching type is bad design practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry you disagree, Fajar, but that&#8217;s the nice part about a blog — I can voice my opinion and you can voice yours. I think you&#8217;d find that 99% of professional designers would tell you that stretching type is bad design practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fajar</title>
		<link>http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>fajar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-424</guid>
		<description>No freaking way. I?m absolutely disagreeing. Next time when you post something think about reaction of readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No freaking way. I?m absolutely disagreeing. Next time when you post something think about reaction of readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Tane Design</title>
		<link>http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Tane Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, EM. This is just design for design's sake, which I am not down with at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, EM. This is just design for design&#8217;s sake, which I am not down with at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizasmom</title>
		<link>http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>elizasmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leslietanedesign.com/blog/adobe-supports-bad-design/107#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I think the stretched type isn't even the worst of it. The color scheme, the random white lines, the arrow. What's going on here? This thing is way too busy with frills and foofs that don't tell me anything. Why is some of the info on that outlined amp? Why is some floating around in that arrow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the stretched type isn&#8217;t even the worst of it. The color scheme, the random white lines, the arrow. What&#8217;s going on here? This thing is way too busy with frills and foofs that don&#8217;t tell me anything. Why is some of the info on that outlined amp? Why is some floating around in that arrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.332 seconds -->
